If I would have to choose the Windows version I will always remember, then it's going to be Windows 3.11 for Workgroups, combined with the Win 32s libraries. No Internet, no worries, just getting started with DOS&Windows-based computers...although I've been using and even programming some Sinclair Spectrum compatible oldies. Well, those were the days of our lives back in the early 1990s, and now there is more than a decade spent under the Microsoft banner for most of us, maybe even two decades, for those using Windows since version 1.0...but what about the future?

As you probably noticed already, the advertising campaign for Microsoft Windows Vista doesn't look too good. I must repeat - this is my personal opinion, and I talked about it yesterday. Some of my friends told me today this campaign is well done, and I respect their opinions, although I don't agree. While more and more get to the conclusion that Vista is a OS that suffered from premature birth, it seems Microsoft is looking two steps forward, as the first news regarding the follower to Windows 7, currently known only as "Midori," started to pop up.<-180x150 Small Rectangle - right->

One of the most interesting scenarios regarding Microsoft Midori is that this future OS is designed for use over the Web, where applications reside on centralized servers, and documents made public already are showing that Microsoft researchers are keeping an eye on getting the most out of multicore processors, but that's not a surprise. After all, despite all negative opinions, Vista is better in most scenarios involving multicore systems, when compared to the older Windows XP. As usual, please correct me if I'm wrong!

Since Windows 7 is currently expected to drop by in 2010-2011, and the statements made so far are showing that we'll get a "different Vista," "Midori" could be the last hope for those still expecting a new OS from Microsoft, a system that can really bring people and businesses together, and turn your computer time into something as natural as swimming or running around.

Back when I was a kid, I run into a very interesting book in my parents' library. Apart from various social games, it also involved funny experiments for children, but not only for them. Anyway, the idea is that some experiments should remain for children, while others have no age limit, but what about advertising? We all know at least one of those interesting banned commercials, but I also happen to know a lot of failed advertising experiments. I don't know what others think just yet, but my personal thought is that Microsoft just managed to throw off the window some millions...

...since the campaign to promote Vista has just started, but not with the right foot, if you ask me or any of the people I managed to talk about this topic so far. Let's start with the name - The "Mojave Experiment". All I want to say about it is "experiments can fail, thinking never fails."

Just think...different! When I see this name, I can't stop thinking about Apple's "Think Different" campaign. While that was targeting the users' needs, and pointing out that Apple and its customers are special, Microsoft goes the other way around.<-336x280 Large Rectangle - right->

While Apple's evolution is slowly pushing them towards the same "evil corporation" image Microsoft has for a lot of people, I can't help but notice that The "Mojave Experiment" is nothing more but a collection of samples with similar results. Everyone finds something nice to say about Vista, the people in the videos are all full of joy, smiling, maybe in the near future they'll also add someone to kiss a Windows Vista DVD case...

I have seen a lot of bad TV ads, and a lot of brilliant Internet marketing campaigns. In fact, I think most Internet campaigns I've been checking out were at least well done. The "Mojave Experiment" is not. I know, there may be people that like it, and I have nothing against them. In fact, I would really like to hear their opinions, but before closing this article, I would like to ask all of you one question: did you notice anyone pointing out how Vista is useful to people with disabilities?

Maybe I wasn't paying enough attention, and I can't go as far as claiming that someone saying "Vista is a mess" should appear on the experiment's site, but I think Steve Ballmer just managed to throw away a bucket full of money to show people that try to look honest, but fail with one major task: behaving like a bunch of different computer users, with different opinions, not just different ways of saying "Vista is sexy, amazing, incredible" and so on.

Now, let me add that the Mojave Experiment is nothing more but an experiment for children, because "disguising Vista" as "Mojave" is something that would insult any person using a computer more than 4 hours per week. Well...that's it, Vista got beaten up severely by Mac OS X, and the experiment for children could be easily turned into a better one...by disguising Vista into...Mac OS X!

Despite the fact Windows Vista works well with most modern computers, once you finished tuning it, I still consider Windows XP the best choice for a lot of PC users that still want to remain by Microsoft's side. I am not talking about things I've heard on the street, because I am a Windows user having to choose between XP and Vista each time I boot up my computer(not too often, I should say that, since sometimes I get Windows uptime of 1-2 or even 3 weeks or more), and Windows XP wins in over 90% of the cases. Anyway, since having an older OS on a modern computer can sometimes cause problems, let's see a few speed tweaks for XP, shall we?

Obviously, there are hundreds of registry tweaks, as well as software Windows optimizers, but I don't want to talk about those now. Why? Well, in the last 6-7 years, these have always been hot topics on the Web, while others are still hanging in the balance.

For example, let's take the optimum swap file size. According to Microsoft, this should be 2.5 times the amount of memory your computer has. While this is efficient with computers having less than 1GB of memory, and can be further improved by creating a partition only for the swap file, there's something you don't hear too often - disable the swap file!<-336x280 Large Rectangle - right->

Yes, I know, this can lead to various problems, but it depends a lot on the programs you're using. Anyway, the advantage is that, as long as you have at least 2GB of memory, it should be enough to keep Windows XP away from writing data to disc when it shouldn't. For example, now I have a bunch of programs up and running, over 1GB of free memory, but also 1GB of swap user. Got the idea? While disabling the swap file will surely limit multitasking capabilities, your computer will be much faster with only a few programs open. Give it a try! After all, you can always get back and restore default settings...

I know some may say this is not really a speed tweak for Windows XP, but it may be the best choice in the right place and the right time. As an example, I was just about to sell my old computer, but after giving away the video card, hard drive and memory, I decided it would be better to keep it and turn it into a Linux box. I found a 40GB hard drive lying around that I considered dead, performed a low level format, and now that one is as good as new, I got an old GeForce 4 MX440 video card that was also lying around, but I only managed to find 256MB of memory. Considering this, and after a lot of research, I got to a point where the only conclusion was that Xubuntu is the best OS for my oldie, and this is the pure truth - compared to those days when I was running Windows XP using only 256MB of memory, Xubuntu is going as fast as a shark!

One last thing - if you are looking for speed tweaks for XP, it may be possible that your solution is one of the two unconventional ones I just described. I know this may sound strange, but the straight line between two points is not always the shortest path...