<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 5 Ways to Speed Up Windows Vista</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.softdistrict.com/5-ways-to-speed-up-windows-vista/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.softdistrict.com/5-ways-to-speed-up-windows-vista/</link>
	<description>Software News and Reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 21:35:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: KodrutZ</title>
		<link>http://www.softdistrict.com/5-ways-to-speed-up-windows-vista/comment-page-1/#comment-1294</link>
		<dc:creator>KodrutZ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 11:34:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.softdistrict.com/5-ways-to-speed-up-windows-vista.html#comment-1294</guid>
		<description>Who said to change ALL to manual????

Try going to Windows/System32 and run system.msc from there, manually. Then revert changes. That should work, but I can&#039;t guarantee it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who said to change ALL to manual????</p>
<p>Try going to Windows/System32 and run system.msc from there, manually. Then revert changes. That should work, but I can&#8217;t guarantee it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: clara pirie</title>
		<link>http://www.softdistrict.com/5-ways-to-speed-up-windows-vista/comment-page-1/#comment-1293</link>
		<dc:creator>clara pirie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 11:26:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.softdistrict.com/5-ways-to-speed-up-windows-vista.html#comment-1293</guid>
		<description>i typed in systems.msc and changed all the automatic features and services to manual. all was fine until i turned the computer on and on logging on my system seems to have reverted to what seems like an old version of windows. none of my programs are starting up and when i typed in systems.msc again it says &#039;search failed to initialise&#039;. control panel opens up but is just an empty window and i do not know what to do. help????</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i typed in systems.msc and changed all the automatic features and services to manual. all was fine until i turned the computer on and on logging on my system seems to have reverted to what seems like an old version of windows. none of my programs are starting up and when i typed in systems.msc again it says &#8217;search failed to initialise&#8217;. control panel opens up but is just an empty window and i do not know what to do. help????</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Codrut Nistor</title>
		<link>http://www.softdistrict.com/5-ways-to-speed-up-windows-vista/comment-page-1/#comment-75</link>
		<dc:creator>Codrut Nistor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Oct 2007 17:11:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.softdistrict.com/5-ways-to-speed-up-windows-vista.html#comment-75</guid>
		<description>From my experience, I can say that Vista uses about the same approach to using memory as Mac OS, but there&#039;s only one problem - while Mac OS X uses HFS+, which is a very capable file system, Microsoft dropped WinFS along the way, so Vista can&#039;t rely on a file system that can really improve disk performance.

On the other hand, we got ReadyBoost, which is a really nice addition, but my opinion is that Vista shouldn&#039;t have been launched without a new file system to maximize its capabilities the right way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From my experience, I can say that Vista uses about the same approach to using memory as Mac OS, but there&#8217;s only one problem &#8211; while Mac OS X uses HFS+, which is a very capable file system, Microsoft dropped WinFS along the way, so Vista can&#8217;t rely on a file system that can really improve disk performance.</p>
<p>On the other hand, we got ReadyBoost, which is a really nice addition, but my opinion is that Vista shouldn&#8217;t have been launched without a new file system to maximize its capabilities the right way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
